Rachna v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for directions to expedite Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceedings was dismissed by the High Court for lack of exceptional grounds.
Application for directions to expedite Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceedings was dismissed by the High Court for lack of exceptional grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:143756
Court No. - 81
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1517 of 2024
Applicant :- Rachna Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amrita Kashyap,Durga Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
Applicant has approached this Court through this application under Section 483 Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Buddh Nagar to expedite and conclude the proceedings of Case No. 812 of 2023, titled Rachna and another Vs. Praveen, under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in a stipulated period. Concededly, the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed on 25th September, 2023 and after appearance of the opposite party in November, 2023, the parties were relegated to the mediation center.
No exceptional ground is made out for issuing the directions for expeditious disposal of the trial . The application fails and is hereby dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.9.2024
Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether exceptional grounds exist for issuing directions to expedite the trial under Section 483 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rachna
State of U.P.
Manoj Bajaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court