This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:166026
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 1405 of 2024
Applicant :- Hari Narayan Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Yadav,Prince Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gorakhpur to decide the Case No. 877 of 1989 State Vs. Adi Nath and others arising out of Case Crime No. 21 of 1989 under Sections 147, 148, 323, 452, 504, 379 IPC, Police Station-Gagaha, District-Gorakhpur expeditiously within stipulated time.
Expeditious disposal of a case is the right of every litigant and it is expected from every Court to endeavour to dispose of a case pending before it, expeditiously.
Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection in this regard.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is expedient to direct the court concerned to make its endeavour to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, in accordance with law, if there is no other legal impediment.
With the aforesaid directions, the application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.10.2024 Shivani
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANI SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate to decide a pending case expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hari Narayan Yadav
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court