Disposed

Rishabh Lodhi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC25 Oct 2024A482/9879/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposed of a bail application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court permitted the applicant to furnish a consolidated personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties for validity in all four criminal cases where bail had already been granted.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each (one local) valid in all four cases.

Rishabh Lodhi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72608

¶2

Court No. - 29

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9879 of 2024 Applicant :- Rishabh Lodhi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Sharma,Shivam Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶6

Heard Shri Shivam Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Piyush Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record.

¶7

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in 4 cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in 4 criminal cases and has been granted bail by the learned High Court/courts below, the details of cases are as under :-

¶9

(i) Case Crime No. 097 of 2021, under Sections 380, 411, 413, 414 IPC, P.S. Aliganj, DistrictLucknow;

¶10

(ii) Case Crime No. 118 of 2021, under Sections 411, 413, 414 IPC, P.S. Aliganj, District- Lucknow;

¶11

(iii) Case Crime No. 095 of 2021, under Sections 379, 411 IPC, P.S. Aliganj, District- Lucknow;

¶12

(iv) Case Crime No. 214 of 2022, under Sections 3(1) of UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Aliganj, District- Lucknow.

¶13

The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court.

¶14

In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties in one case for release in all the 4 cases.

¶15

It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each and atleast one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the 4 cases wherein the bail orders have been passed.

¶17

(Subhash Vidyarthi,J)

¶18

Order Date :- 25.10.2024 V. Sinha

¶19

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rishabh Lodhi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishabh Lodhi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dharmendra Prajapati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Dharmendra Prajapati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Aparna Rajesh Soni vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and Another

Md. Sageer and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. and 4 Others

Barati and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Yunus Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies Lko. and 3 Others