Allowed

Dharmendra Prajapati v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allahabad HC24 Oct 2024/11204/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application in a cheating/criminal breach of trust case concerning non-refund of investments in a company. Court noted bail granted in 47 similar cases and to co-accused including the company's Chairman and Managing Director, and allowed bail with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant Dharmendra Prajapati released on bail on personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions.

Dharmendra Prajapati Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71913

¶2

Court No. - 29

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11204 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Dharmendra Prajapati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Puneet Kumar Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶7

The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 845 of 2020, under Sections 409, 420, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶8

The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 28.10.2020 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that the applicant had made some investments in Massair Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. but the amount was not refunded to him.

¶9

The applicant's criminal history of 52 cases has been disclosed in para 15 of the affidavit filed in support of the application and the applicant has been granted bail in 47 cases of similar nature.

¶10

The co-accused persons-Ratan Chandra Dwivedi, Abhinav Kumar Singh and Rakesh Gupta, have already been granted bail in the present case.

¶11

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the grievance of the applicant is regarding non refund of money invested in a company, that the applicant has already been granted bail in 47 other cases of similar nature and the Chairman and the Managing Director of the company has already been granted bail in the present case and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.04.2021, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶12

Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶13

Let the applicant-Dharmendra Prajapati be released on bail in

¶14

Case Crime No. 845 of 2020, under Sections 409, 420, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶15

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶16

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶17

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶18

[ Subhash Vidyarthi,J. ]

¶19

Order Date :- 24.10.2024 A.Nigam

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dharmendra Prajapati v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Prajapati v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Firdaus Akhtar @ Shadab Akhtar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko

Sarvesh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Akash Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko and Another

Vaibhav Singh @ Shishu Singh vs State of U,P. Thru. Prin. Home Lko

Shadab vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Krishna Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others