In an S. 482 Cr.P.C. application to quash a summoning order, the applicant requested to file a discharge application instead, which was accented with a direction for expeditious hearing; coercive action stayed pending.
Permitted applicant to file discharge application within four weeks; coercive steps stayed pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74445
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9388 of 2024 Applicant :- Sachin Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Farhan Alam Osmany,Aruna Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 12.11.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
