In this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners challenged a summoning order in a complaint case as a counter blast and based on unexplained delay. While acknowledging the petitioners' arguments, the court reserved its opinion and listed the case for fresh hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8199 of 2024
Applicant :- Dilshaad Khan And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sachin Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
from perusal of the complaint or from the summoning order as has been issued by the learned court and thus prima facie a case is made out against the respondent no.2.
Order Date :- 12.9.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the subsequent complaint and summoning order constitute a counter blast to the earlier FIR.
Whether the one and a half month delay in filing the complaint warrants quashing the proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dilshaad Khan
State of U.P.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
