Disposed

Ram Bhawan Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC31 Aug 2024A482/7683/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed an application to quash an order of non-bailable warrant. Instead, it disposed of the matter by granting liberty to the applicant to file a bail application before the trial court, directing that it be decided expeditiously based on Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail application before trial court; direction to trial court to decide bail expeditiously.

Ram Bhawan Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:59555

¶2

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7683 of 2024 Applicant :- Ram Bhawan Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶4

Heard Ms. Abhilash Nishad learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Rakesh Kumar Nayak, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶5

The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶6

"The applicant above named most respectfully begs to submit that for the facts, reasons and circumstances as stated in the accompanying affidavit, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order of non bailable warrant dated 23.11.2022 as well as 29.07.2024 passed by Additional Session Judge- First, Ambedkar Nagar in the proceeding of in Case Crime No. 42/2018, under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467, 468, 471 1.P.C. Police Station Ahirauli, District Ambedkar Nagar, in the interest of justice."

¶7

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶10

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

¶11

Order Date :- 31.8.2024

¶12

Jyoti/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Bhawan Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bhawan Verma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Uma Shankar @ Uma Shankar Mishra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Sechu Pal (Actual Name Santosh Pal) Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Arvind Kumar Tiwari Alias Anil Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Awadhesh Kumar Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Shubham Mishra and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Sri Kishan Rawat vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another