High Court allowed application seeking quashing of criminal proceedings after finding that the dispute was successfully settled through court-annexed mediation.
The entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:83011
Court No. - 28
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6543 of 2024
Applicant :- Santosh Kumat Tripathi And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Sachin Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Irshad Ali
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
prosecution to prosecute the present applicants would be a futile exercise and in view of the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in re: B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; 2003 (4) SCC 675 , Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 ; State of Rajasthan vs. Shambhu Kewat, (2014) 4 SCC 149 ; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Deepak (2014) 10 SCC 285 ; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Manish (2015) 8 SCC 307 ; J.Ramesh Kamath vs. Mohana Kurup (2016) 12 SCC 179 ; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Rajveer Singh (2016) 12 SCC 471 ; Parbatbhai AAhir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 , the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case are hereby quashed . The mediation report dated 12.11.2024 submitted by the Mediators vide Mediation Case No.644 of 2024 would be the part of this order.
Order Date :- 11.12.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed upon the report of successful mediation and settlement between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana v. B.S. JoshiReferred¶1
re: B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; 2003 (4) SCC 675 · Who else cites this
Gian Singh v. State of PunjabReferred¶1
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu KewatReferred¶1
State of Rajasthan vs. Shambhu Kewat, (2014) 4 SCC 149 · Who else cites this
State of M.P. v. DeepakReferred¶1
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Deepak (2014) 10 SCC 285 · Who else cites this
State of M.P. v. ManishReferred¶1
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Manish (2015) 8 SCC 307 · Who else cites this
J. Ramesh Kamath v. Mohana KurupReferred¶1
J.Ramesh Kamath vs. Mohana Kurup (2016) 12 SCC 179 · Who else cites this
State of M.P. v. Rajveer SinghReferred¶1
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Rajveer Singh (2016) 12 SCC 471 · Who else cites this
Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of GujaratReferred¶1
Parbatbhai AAhir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumat Tripathi And 3 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Another
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
