Disposed

Amrendra ( as Per Fir Amrendra Rawat Alias Gupta ) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC5 Jul 2024A482/5924/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Lucknow disposed of an application under Section 482 CrPC. Instead of determining the application on merits, the court granted liberty to move for bail and directed swift disposal by the lower court, along with a direction to police to refrain from coercive action for 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to move bail; lower court directed to decide bail application expeditiously; police directed not to take coercive action for 30 days.

Amrendra ( as Per Fir Amrendra Rawat Alias Gupta ) vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:45644

¶2

Court No. - 13

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5924 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Amrendra ( As Per Fir Amrendra Rawat Alias Gupta ) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Gauri Suwan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶7

The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash/set aside the charge sheet dated 13.01.2023 and cognizance & summoning order dated 05.03.2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 432 of 2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 313/2022, under Sections- 279, 337, 338, 304A, 427 IPC, Police Station- Atariya, District- Sitapur.

¶8

Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and going through the record as also taking note of the same in the light of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq, another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 and Parabatbhai Ahir & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat AIR 2017 SC 4843 , on being confronted, after arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move bail application, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶10

The Apex Court, after considering the various pronouncements on the issues, in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021 has already laid down guidelines for grant of bail, without fettering the discretion of the courts concerned and the statutory provisions governing

¶11

consideration in grant of bail, no specific directions need to be issued by this Court as it is expected that the court concerned will take into consideration the necessary guidelines already issued by the Apex Court.

¶12

Keeping in view the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, the application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court below within 30 days from today, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶13

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officers concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, they would not taken any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.7.2024 Arun/-

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Amrendra ( as Per Fir Amrendra Rawat Alias Gupta ) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrendra ( as Per Fir Amrendra Rawat Alias Gupta ) v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Aaftab Ahmad @ Babloo and 10 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mridula Mishra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home and Another

Amit Kumar Azad and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Rajesh @ Subedar and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Praduman Kumar Mishra @ Babbu vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohd. Riyasat Ali and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another