Disposed

Vikas and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC21 May 2024A482/4525/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under S. 482 CrPc seeking quashing of criminal proceedings based on an amicably settled compromise, the High Court directed the parties to approach the trial court to verify the compromise deed. Once verified, the proceedings may be quashed.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of. The parties were directed to appear before the trial court to verify the compromise deed after which the proceedings may be quashed.

Vikas and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38203

¶2

Court No. - 15

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4525 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikas And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakant Sahu,Shambhu Shanker Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Vinay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 who has filed vakalatnama which is taken on record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 4 to the petition. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the said compromise may be directed to be verified by the competent authority so that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of said compromise and its verification report.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has no objection to this innocuous prayer.

¶9

In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 05.06.2024 along with the copy of original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within one week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties.

¶10

For a period of two months, the proceedings of Case No. 36535/2020 arising out of F.I.R. No. 285/2019, U/S- 498A/323 I.P.C. and % D. P. Act, Police Station-Mohanlalganj,

¶11

District- Lucknow shall be kept in abeyance.

¶12

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.

¶13

Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification.

¶14

Office is directed to return certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules of the Court.

¶15

Order Date :- 21.5.2024 R.C.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vikas and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Sangam Kumar Verma Alias Sangam Verma Thru. His Real Brother Sanjay Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko.

Kaleem Ahmad and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Chaman Prakash Kashyap vs State, through S.P. C.B.I. /Acb/Lucknow

Habbu @ Ankur Saroj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.

Shaiba Zaidi and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another