Disposed

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Allahabad HC17 May 2024/790/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Section 482 CrPC application, the court directed the parties to verify an out-of-court compromise before the trial court while keeping the criminal proceedings in abeyance for three months. A copy of the compromise is to be placed on record.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings kept in abeyance for three months; parties directed to verify compromise before trial court.

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others Vs State of U.P… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38018

¶2

Court No. - 15

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 790 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Shivansh Srivastava, Abdullah Khan and Hafijur Rahman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Srivastava,Syed Azaz Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pawan Kumar Misra

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for respondent No.2 as also learned A.G.A., and perused the record.

¶7

2.The instant petition has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the proceedings of Case No. 95341 of 2022 arising out of crime No.14 of 2022 State versus Shivansh Srivastava and others, pending in the court of Special CJM, Customs, Lucknow under sections 419, 420 I.P.C. and 66 I.T. Act, P.S. Cyber Crime, District Lucknow arising out of case crime No.14 of 2022 (charge sheet dated 25.10.2022).

¶8

3.Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved outside the court by way of compromise which is on record. It is submitted that on the basis of the compromise, the impugned proceedings are liable to be quashed.

¶9

4.Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concedes that the dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and he has no objection if the impugned proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise after its verification from the competent court.

¶10

Learned A.G.A has also no objection in case the impugned proceedings are quashed on the basis of compromise, subject to its verification by the concerned court.

¶11

5.Accordingly, having due regard to the submissions made by the parties' counsel, perusal of the compromise as also considering the law laid down by Supreme Court in (2012)10 SCC 303 Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and another, the petition is disposed of with direction to the parties to appear before the trial court on 3.6.2024, which shall verify the compromise in presence of the

¶12

parties within the next one week. The trial court shall provide a copy of the verification report to the parties. A copy of compromise be placed on record of the trial court. It will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶13

For a period of three months, impugned proceedings shall remain in abeyance.

¶14

6.Office is directed to return original/certified copy of the compromise to learned counsel for the petitioners and retain a photocopy thereof, under Rules of the Court.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.5.2024 kkb/

¶16

Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Pushpa Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and Another

Suneel Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vipin Kumar (Vipin Kumar Alias V.P Impugned Chargesheet) Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Shivansh Srivastava and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Brijesh Singh vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mohit vs State of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another