Disposed

Shadab @ Yusuf Khan v. State of Up and 3 Others

Allahabad HC27 Nov 2024A482/40509/2024

Download

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

A compact analysis

Shadab @ Yusuf Khan vs State of Up and 3… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40509 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Shadab @ Yusuf Khan Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Tripurari Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rama Yadav,G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent and perused the record on Board.

¶6

It is submitted that during pendency of the criminal proceedings, both the parties have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court and arrived at compromise. At present, both the parties have buried the hatchet and they have no grudge against each other. Therefore, instant application may be allowed and the criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of the compromise.

¶7

Learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 has nodded the submissions as advanced by the learned counsel for the applicants and admitted the factum of the compromise took place between the parties. It is next contended that in changed circumstances, opposite party No. 2 is not inclined to prosecute the present applicants and, therefore, instant application may be allowed and entire criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise.

¶8

In this conspectus, as above, both the parties are hereby directed to appear before the court below on 6/7.01.2025 to get their compromise verified. Learned court concerned, in turn, shall verify the same in the presence of both the parties after recording their statements and submit his verification report before this Court within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the parties.

¶9

List this matter on 12.03.2025 along with verification report submitted by the court concerned, if any.

¶10

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings in Session Trial No.1499 of 2022 (State Vs. Shadab @ Yusuf Khan), arising out of Case Crime No.579 of 2020, under Sections 363, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra,

¶11

pending in the court of learned Additional & Sessions Judge, Court No.27, Agra, shall remain stayed.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.12.2024 Mini

¶13

Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shadab @ Yusuf Khan v. State of Up and 3 Others

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Shadab @ Yusuf Khan v. State of Up and 3 Others

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Altaf Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Nagendra Prasad Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Nazim vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kishor Apchari ka through Mother vs State of Up and other

Amita Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Bablu Gautam vs U.O.I. Thru Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Narcotics Control Bureau Lucknow