In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court directed the Additional Principal Judge to submit a report explaining why recovery warrants dated 03.06.2023 for maintenance were not executed against the opposite party.
Direction to the concerned court to submit a report on delay in execution of warrants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39706 of 2024
Applicant :- Shakuntala Chaurasiya And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sufia Saba,Uzma Mansoori Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
2. Perused the record.
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and direct the concerned court i.e. Additional Principal Judge, in Executions Case 1689/2022 is roscope Family Court 1st Jaunpur to direct the concerned Police Station to execute the recovery warrants dated 03.06.2023 upon respondent no.2 in accordance with law and recovered the maintenance amount of Rs.3,25,000 from the opposite party no.2 or search the moveable as well as immoveable property of opposite part no.2 as early as possible otherwise, the applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and hardship.
And/or may pass such any other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
Order Date :- 28.11.2024 Imtiyaz
Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the concerned court to submit a report regarding the non-execution of recovery warrants under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shakuntala Chaurasiya And Another
Rajeev Misra
Imtiyaz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
