This order dismisses an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by Lalit Nahar as withdrawn. The applicant intended to seek an alternative legal remedy rather than pursuing the current quashal prayer against a rejection of a Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. application.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:173852
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37091 of 2024
Applicant :- Lalit Nahar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pranav Kumar Srivastava,Rakesh Kumar Bharti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
learned counsel for the State that an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable against an order rejecting the application of the complainant under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Jagannath Verma Vs. State of UP.: 2014 (8) ADJ 439.
Order Date :- 6.11.2024 Priya
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable against an order rejecting an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
Whether the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C should be dismissed as withdrawn.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagannath Verma Vs. State of UP.Referred¶8
: 2014 (8) ADJ 439.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalit Nahar
State Of U.P.
Samit Gopal
Priya Kushwaha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
