Deepak v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application pending before the Allahabad bench; vakalatnama of counsel for opposite party no. 2 taken on record and two weeks' time granted for arguments.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33993 of 2024
Applicant :- Deepak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Alok Srivastava, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of private opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record.
Office is directed to print the name of Sri Alok Srivastava in the appropriate column of counsel in the next cause list.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to argue the case.
Put up this case on 28.11.2024, as fresh.
It is made clear that no interim order has been passed.
Order Date :- 4.10.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Deepak
- respondent
State Of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/33993/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court