Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of charge sheet, cognizance and summoning orders in a vigilance case alleging appointment as Physical Instructor on forged D.P.Ed. qualification. The court held that the pending pension writ petition had no bearing on criminal proceedings and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31921 of 2024
Applicant :- Narendra Pratap Rao Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Singh,Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 21.9.2024 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Should the charge sheet, cognizance order and summoning order and entire criminal proceedings be quashed/stayed given the pendency of a writ petition regarding the applicant's pension?
Does the pending writ petition on pensionary benefits affect or stay the criminal proceedings?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Narendra Pratap Rao
State of U.P.
Ramnath Gupta
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
