Tahir v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This order does not dispose of the matter. It is a procedural direction to put the case up on a fresh date due to the non-appearance of the applicant. No interim order has been passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30710 of 2024
Applicant :- Tahir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
In the interest of justice, put up this case on 27.3.2025, as fresh.
It is made clear that no interim order has been passed.
Order Date :- 12.11.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tahir
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/30710/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court