Noor Mohammad v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Noor Mohammad challenging false implication in an FIR. Learned A.A.G. granted two weeks to file response. Adjourned.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30423 of 2024
Applicant :- Noor Mohammad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Patsy David,Sanju Lata Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant has taken permission before entering into the Indian territory, and despite that the police have lodged the FIR against the applicant.
- Learned A.A.G. seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file a response to the contentions raised in the instant application.
- Put up as fresh on 28.11.2024.
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Noor Mohammad
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/30423/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjay Kumar Pachori
- Order 2 · Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court