Informant v. State of Upand Another
Case brief
What is this about?
An application filed by an informant under Section 482 pending before the Allahabad High Court was adjourned; the judge deferred arguments on maintainability to a later date after the State raised objections.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29444 of 2024
Applicant :- Informant Opposite Party :- State Of Upand Another Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Srivastava,Reena Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant takes time to address arguments on the issue of maintainability. However, learned A.G.A. submits that the instant petition is not maintainable in the present form.
- Put up this case on 24.01.2025, as fresh.
Order Date :- 4.9.2024 Imtiyaz
(Justice Vinod Diwakar)
Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Informant
- respondent
State Of Upand Another
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/29444/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court