The applicants challenged the revisional order remanding the matter after a final report in their favor was set aside. The court declined to interfere, noting the revisional court corrected grey areas and provided a fair chance, with no jurisdictional error apparent. The application was consigned to record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:180293
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28259 of 2024
Applicant :- Sonpal Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Chandra,Sr. Advocate,Vishakha Pande,Yashaswin Venugopal Bajpai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Parivar Register which is at page-73 of the paper-book it is being sought to be contended that the informant is not the sister and rather she is not related to the deceased. It is also submitted that the court below has has manifestly erred in interfering on the basis of an affidavits which are cryptic.
Order Date :- 18.11.2024 N.S.Rathour
(Vikas Budhwar, J)
Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the order of the Revisional Court remanding the matter back?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sonpal Singh And 2 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
