The applicant challenged a chargesheet via an application under Section 482 CrPC alleging offences related to a fraudulent sale deed and cheque dishonour. The Court held that defence material cannot be scrutinized at this stage and rejected the application for lack of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:3835
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 263 of 2024
Applicant :- Manoj Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 12.1.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the validity of the chargesheet for offences under Sections 406, 420, and 506 IPC should be allowed.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Manoj Kumar And Another
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
Raj Nigam
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
