Court rejected an application under Section 482 CrPC challenging a chargesheet for cheating and forgery. The court held that it cannot consider defence allegations or trial evidence at this interlocutory stage, finding the application lacked merit.
Application under Section 482 CrPC rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:3835
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 263 of 2024
Applicant :- Manoj Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 12.1.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can consider defence allegations in an application under Section 482 CrPC.
Whether the present application under Section 482 CrPC has merit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manoj Kumar
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
