Jasvir v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant was absent despite notice. The court listed the application for fresh consideration on a subsequent date, clarifying that no interim orders had been passed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26157 of 2024
Applicant :- Jasvir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
In the interest of justice, put up this case on 11.9.2024, as fresh.
It is made clear that no interim order has been passed.
Order Date :- 9.8.2024 Shiv
Digitally signed by :- SHIV KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jasvir
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/26157/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjay Kumar Pachori
- Order 2 · Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court