Pranjal Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application where counsel argued allegations were mainly against a co-accused; State granted four weeks to obtain instructions and the matter adjourned for fresh listing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25263 of 2024
Applicant :- Pranjal Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Singh,Shivam Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the main allegation is against the co-accused. No specific allegation has been made against the present applicant.
- Learned A.G.A. seeks and is granted four weeks time to obtain complete instructions in the matter.
- List on 10.12.2024 as fresh.
Order Date :- 5.8.2024 Prajapati
(Justice Vinod Diwakar)
Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pranjal Mishra
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/25263/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court