Application to quash summoning order, charge sheet and proceedings for assault offences. Court found intimation of the offence was given immediately with prompt medical examination showing the incident occurred; police-side FIR delay was of no consequence. Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:147663
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
(Sl.No.1)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24017 of 2024
Applicant :- Parmanand And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Kumar Pandey,Ritesh Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
informant side. Therefore it shows that the incident, which is alleged in the FIR has actually taken place. The Statement of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. also supports the incident. Therefore, a prima facie case is made out against the applicants and no interference is called for while exercising the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Order Date :- 9.9.2024 Ashish Pd.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in registration of the FIR justifies quashing of the charge sheet, summoning order and criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Parmanand and 2 Others
State of U.P.
Opposite Party no.2
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
