The applicant sought to quash criminal proceedings and the cognizance order. The prayer was refused, and the application was withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines on pre-arrest bail.
Liberty to file regular bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:173659
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23337 of 2024
Applicant :- Arjun And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajkumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Rajkumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Rahul Pandey, brief holder for the State and perused the material on record.
The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 498 of 2024, (State Vs. Arjun and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 124 of 2020, under Sections 308, 323, 504 of I.P.C., Police Station- Aung, District- Fatehpur, as well as cognizance/ summoning order 20.01.2024 pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Fatehpur.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.
Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC
Online SC 941.
The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 6.11.2024 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶11
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶11
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 · Who else cites this
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I.Referred¶11
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arjun And 2 Others
State of U.P. and Another
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
