Praveen @ Pammi and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Matter listed for filing supplementary affidavit regarding trial status.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23243 of 2024
Applicant :- Praveen @ Pammi And 9 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Bindeshwari Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Shri Vineet Singh Parmar, Advocate holding brief of Shri C.P. Tripathi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party No. 2 today, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicants prays for and is granted two weeks time to file supplementary affidavit annexing therewith status of trial along with the statements, if any recorded before the trial court.
Put up on 20.1.2025 as fresh showing the name of Shri C.P. Tripathi as counsel for the opposite party No. 2.
Order Date :- 6.11.2024 T. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Praveen @ Pammi And 9 Others
Coram
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/23243/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court