Single bench order fixing the next date for verifying a filed compromise deed in a quashing application before Juvenile Justice Board, directing parties to appear and ensuring terms fulfillment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23139 of 2024
Applicant :- X Juvenile Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Achyuta Nand Pandey,Anand Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
made by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Order Date :- 23.7.2024 Kalp Nath Singh
Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether proceedings should be quashed based on a pending compromise deed between the juvenile applicant and the State.
Whether the trial court must verify the authenticity of the compromise and fulfillment of terms before passing an order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh v. State of PunjabReferred¶8
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
X Juvenile
State of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
