Alok Daksh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application adjourned; counsel for opposite party no. 2 took over and sought adjournment.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22873 of 2024
Applicant :- Alok Daksh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhinav Gaur Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Sri Devesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2, which is taken on record and he seeks adjournment for today.
Put up this case on 13.12.2024 , as fresh, showing the name of Sri Devesh Kumar Sharma, as counsel for the opposite party no.2.
Order Date :- 5.12.2024 S Rawat
Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Alok Daksh
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/22873/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court