Smt Raj Kumari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
An application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings and summons in a matrimonial dispute was heard. The court issued notice to the opposite party and adjourned the matter for filing of counter-affidavits while staying coercive steps.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
(Sl. No. 41)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22621 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt Raj Kumari And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harish Kumar Yadav,Krishna Gopal Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
- Heard Shri Harish Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the State.
- The instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 219 of 2024 (Ruchi Gupta Vs. Punit Vishnoi and others) under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and under section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 police station and District Sambhal pending in the court of Civil Judge (JD)/Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal as well as the summoning order dated 29.2.2024.
- Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants herein are the mother-in-law, father-in-law and brother-in-law of the opposite party no. 2. The opposite party no. 2 was married to the son of the applicants no. 1 and 2 and due to some matrimonial dispute for which an application under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act is already pending between them. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that all the applicants herein are residing separately from the opposite party no. 2 and her husband, therefore, the instant complaint filed by the opposite party no. 2 against the applicants herein is nothing but abuse of process of law. He further submits that the instant complaint has been filed by the opposite party no. 2 on general vague allegations against the family members including her husband. In support of his submissions learned counsel for the applicants has relied upon the judgements of the Apex Court in the case of Abhishek V. State of M.P. AIR 2023 SC 4209 and Kahkashan Kausar@ Sonam and others Vs. State of Bihar and others (2022) 2 SCC (Cri) 684.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 482 Cr.P.C. entitles the applicants to quash proceedings under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act based on alleged abuse of process.
Whether pending proceedings under section 13 Hindu Marriage Act influence the quashing of criminal complaint filed by opposite party.
Whether the summons issued against applicants in matrimonial dispute can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt Raj Kumari And 2 Others
Coram
Anish Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/22621/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court