The High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 315, 420 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute, following a verified compromise between the parties and in the interest of justice.
Quashing of the entire proceedings of case No. 1342 of 2008 against applicant Vishal Tyagi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:144277
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21873 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt Pooja Tyagi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Bishnoi,Kamendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024
SP/-
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and othersRelied on¶13
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt Pooja Tyagi And Another
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
