The High Court allowed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings against the applicants arising from a matrimonial dispute, noting that the parties had compromised and the continuance of proceedings would be a waste of time.
Impugned cognizance-summoning order and entire criminal proceedings quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:138513
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21480 of 2024
Applicant :- Salman And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Laxmi Kant Bhatt Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Order Date :- 29.8.2024
SP/-
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute should be quashed on the basis of a valid compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi NarayanRelied on¶13
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Salman
State of U.P.
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
