The High Court allowed the applicant's prayer to substitute six sureties with two sureties across three cases where bail was already granted, relying on Supreme Court precedent.
Permission granted to file personal bonds and two sureties in all cases, with sureties in one case treated as valid for all others.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:19747
Court No. - 11
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2058 of 2024 Applicant :- Gunjan Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra,Manish Arora Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 4.3.2024 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant may be permitted to file two sureties instead of six in multiple cases where bail has already been granted?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ VikkyRelied on¶8
Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018)
Gunjan Verma
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
