Single judge allowed bail application seeking validity of two sureties in one case for all three cases where applicant was already bailed, relying on Supreme Court precedent.
Petitioner permitted to file personal bonds; furnishing two sureties in one case shall be treated valid in all cases where bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:19747
Court No. - 11
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2058 of 2024 Applicant :- Gunjan Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra,Manish Arora Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 4.3.2024 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to file a personal bond and two sureties validly in all three cases where bail has already been granted despite the non-availability of six sureties.
If so, whether the petitioner needs to furnish sureties in all cases or in just one case for all cases.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar PradeshRelied on¶8
Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018)
Gunjan Verma
State Of U.P
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
