Disposed

Krishan Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC5 Mar 2024A482/2008/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties as sufficient for the applicant in all nine criminal cases, applying the Supreme Court principle that multiple bonds are not required where bail is repeatedly granted.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties as sufficient for all nine pending cases.

Krishan Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:19812

¶2

Court No. - 16

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2008 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Krishan Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi,Devendra Verma,Kajol,Kavita Yadav,Tanupriya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the state and perused the record.

¶7

This instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for directing the learned trial court to release the applicant by accepting only two sureties and not to insist the applicant to file separate surety bonds in each and every nine cases and as mentioned in the application.

¶8

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in nine criminal cases and has been granted bail by the competent courts, the details of cases are as under ;-

¶9

Case Crime No. 149/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich.

¶10

Case Crime No. 162/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich.

¶11

Case Crime No. 164/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich.

¶12

Case Crime No. 381/2022, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich.

¶13

Case Crime No. 213/2023, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich.

¶14

Case Crime No. 287/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich

¶15

Case Crime No. 202/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich

¶16

Case Crime No. 179/2023, under Section 379 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Bahraich

¶17

Case Crime No. 306/2023, under Section 379, 411, 413, 419, 420. 467,468,471 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bahraich

¶18

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant belongs to a very poor family so he is unable to manage 18 persons for surety before the learned trial court.

¶19

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave to appeal Criminal No.8914- 8915 of 2018 Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran alias Viccky vs. State of U.P. and Others had directed that the applicant who was an accused in 31 cases be released on bail taking one personal bond and two sureties.

¶20

A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant be also given the benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad (supra).

¶21

This application is disposed of with the direction to the learned trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in one criminal case against the applicant and such personal bond and sureties shall hold good in all the nine cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.

¶22

Order Date :- 5.3.2024 DiVYa

¶23

Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Krishan Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Salik Ram and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Mithailal Vs State of U.P.

Sant Lal Thru. His Wife Smt. Sumata @ Sitaba Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 5 Others

Smt. Kiran Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addil. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Parshuram Sharma and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Krishan Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.