8. On 30.11.2022, the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was also recorded and the matter was fixed for defence evidence, however, the applicant did not produce any document in support of his case. Thereafter, the matter was fixed for final hearing. After the matter was fixed for final hearing, the applicant herein has moved an application seeking his discharge on 15.03.2023, which was rejected on 12.06.2023. Against the rejection of the discharge application the applicant has approached this Court by filing an Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., which was also rejected by this Court. Subsequently thereto, the applicant herein has moved an application seeking to file the documents, which was allowed vide order 30.10.2023, allowing the applicant herein to produce the relevant documents in support of his case. Subsequent thereto, the instant application has been filed by the applicant herein, now, seeking a direction to the complainant to produce the documents, which has been rejected by the impugned order dated 24.05.2024. As per the earlier application seeking permission to file the documents has already been granted by the trial court concerned. So far as the record of the Complaint Case No. 2237 of 2019 is concerned, the applicant was free to file certified copies of the relevant record of the said case, however, the same has not been produced by the applicant herein. Otherwise also, to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act and to establish that there was no liability on the part of the applicant the burden is on the applicant, which is required to be discharged by the applicant herein and the complainant cannot be directed to produce the documents as prayed by the applicant herein. From the aforesaid conduct of the applicant, it appears that the applicant herein is making continuous attempts to delay the trial of the case by moving one application after another.
