Disposed

Saroj Thru. His Brother Pankaj v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC11 Jan 2024A482/192/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought permission to submit one set of personal bond and sureties to satisfy bail requirements in four separate cases. The court, relying on Apex Court precedent, allowed the application, directing that furnishing a bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties in one case shall be treated valid in the other three cases.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to submit one set of personal bond and sureties valid for four cases.

Saroj Thru. His Brother Pankaj vs State of U.P. Thru… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:3008

¶2

Court No. - 27 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 192 of 2024 Applicant :- Saroj Thru. His Brother Pankaj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- D.P. Dutt Tiwari,Deependra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith.

¶5

2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in four cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.

¶6

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases.

¶7

4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018 ) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶8

5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed.

¶9

Order Date :- 11.1.2024/Preeti.

¶10

Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Saroj Thru. His Brother Pankaj v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Thru. His Brother Pankaj v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Moin Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Jan Mohd. and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. of U.P. Lucknow and Another

Surendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Mohd. Izhar Khan and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. and Another

Juvenile a of Crime No. 176/2023 Thru. His Father Z Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vinay Kumar Mishra and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another