Single judge quashed judgment acquitting applicant in quashing petition for Moin Ahmad on jurisdictional facts identifying identical factual matrix across proceedings.
Quash impugned judgment acquitting applicant as quashing order against same facts devoid of jurisdictional charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:2625
Court No. - 27
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 46 of 2024
Applicant :- Moin Ahmad
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Shanker Tewari,Mohammad Azeem
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 10.1.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment acquitting the applicant under Section 482 CrPC requires quashing based on jurisdictional facts.
Whether a re-appreciation of evidence is required on facts that were found to be identical across records.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Moin Ahmad
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
