Shivcharan v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The learned Additional Government Advocate stated that the application had become infructuous because the applicant's property had already been released. The applicant's counsel requested a short adjournment to verify this fact.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18640 of 2024
Applicant :- Shivcharan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sujit Kumar Agrawal,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned A.G.A. states that the application has become infructuous as the property of the applicant has already been released.
- Learned counsel for the applicant seeks a short accommodation to verify the facts stated by the learned A.G.A.
- Put up on 28.08.2024 as fresh.
Order Date :- 21.8.2024 A. Tripathi
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shivcharan
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Vinod Diwakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/18640/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court