The court dismissed the applicant's petition to quash proceedings due to deficient documentation and failure to substantiate allegations of false implication. The court granted liberty to file a fresh petition with complete records.
Dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition with complete charge-sheet and CDs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:148676
Court No. - 80
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18620 of 2024
Applicant :- Preeti Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Dubey,Prashant Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
implicated in the case, and on examination of documents, no case is made out against the applicant resulting the issuance of impugned order is the abuse of the process of Court and may cause irreparable loss to the applicant.
Order Date :- 11.9.2024 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for quashing the charge-sheet on the ground of false implication?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana v. Bhajan LalReferred¶9
State of Haryana and others v. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Preeti
State of U.P.
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
