The High Court rejected an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., finding no merit to interfere with the impugned order that assigned reasons under Section 204 Cr.P.C., while cautioning counsel regarding inaccurate statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:113972
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1845 of 2024
Applicant :- Tribhuwan Prasad Dubey And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Akhand Pratap Tiwari,Vivek Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sunil Dubey
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1.Heard Sri Vivek Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Sunil Dubey, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2
Order Date :- 18.7.2024
SB
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order assigning reasons under Section 204 Cr.P.C. requires interference by the High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tribhuwan Prasad Dubey And 5 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
