Disposed

Ramkunwar @ Ram Kumar and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC24 Oct 2024A482/17825/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings due to a compromise, the court directed parties to appear before the trial court to verify the compromise within two weeks before allowing quashing, linking it to a related application.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action taken; parties directed to verify compromise before trial court within two weeks.

Ramkunwar @ Ram Kumar and 3 Others vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17825 of 2024

¶3

Applicant :- Ramkunwar @ Ram Kumar And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Irfan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kant Yadav

¶4

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 14.09.2022, of Complaint Case No. 1166 of 2019 (Mukta Prasad vs. Ramkunwar and Others), under Sections - 323, 392 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Kemri, District - Rampur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C., Rampur, in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that on account of intervention of the well-wishers, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the said compromise will be filed before the trial court concerned within two weeks from today. It is further contended that proceedings of the aforesaid case may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶8

Whether a compromise has taken place or not can best be ascertained by the court where the proceedings are pending, after ensuring the presence of the parties before it.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that in case the parties appear before the trial court and file an appropriate application for

¶10

compromise within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be verified by the court concerned in accordance with law and if the said compromise is verified, the same shall be made part of the record and report to that effect will be prepared and the parties would be allowed to obtain certified copy thereof and file the same before this Court by the next date. In case such a compromise is verified, the trial court concerned shall send the report of verification to this Court.

¶11

Connect and list along with Application u/s - 482 No. 17760 of 2024 (Mutka Prasad and 2 Others vs. State of U.P. and Another) .

¶12

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action would be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶13

Order Date :- 24.10.2024 S Rawat

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramkunwar @ Ram Kumar and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkunwar @ Ram Kumar and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohammad Haleem@ Mohammad Hakeem and 8 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhendru Sharma @ Sanjul vs State of U.P. and Another

Ritika Singh and Another vs State of Up and Another

Praveen Kumar vs State of U.P. & 3 Others

Kamil and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Sadhna and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another