Naseem Beg v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application adjourned on the first request by the applicant's counsel; matter to reappear as fresh on 16.09.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17564 of 2024
Applicant :- Naseem Beg Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Manish Kumar Pathak, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pawan Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
- Perused the record.
- On the matter being taken up, a request for adjournment has been prayed on behalf of the learned counsel for applicant.
- Order sheet shows that the adjournment prayed for on behalf of the learned counsel for applicant is the first adjournment.
- In view of above, the hearing of present application is adjourned.
- Matter shall re-appear as fresh on 16.09.2024.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Naseem Beg
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/17564/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court