Hemant Kumar Hayaran and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
During hearing of application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court noted repeated adjournment requests by applicants, cited three previous listings with ineffective attendance or requests, and found lack of urgency. Bench ordered listing in additional cause list for future.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
*********
(Sl. No.02)
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16616 of 2024
Applicant :- Hemant Kumar Hayaran And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vikas Tiwari
Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
- Heard Sri Anuj Bajpayee, Advocate holding brief of Sri Umesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned AGA for the State.
- An adjournment has been sought on behalf of the applicants.
- From the perusal of the order sheet that this matter was listed on 27.5.2024 when adequate request for adjournment. Again the matter was listed on 23.08.2024, when none appears of behalf of the applicants to press the instant application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hemant Kumar Hayaran And 2 Others
Coram
Anish Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/16616/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
- Order 2 · Case IS Not Allocated TO Court.
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court