The Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the DP Act based on a compromise between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, relying on State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan.
Quashing of entire proceedings, charge sheet, and cognizance/summoning order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:136453
Court No. - 76
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16141 of 2024
Applicant :- Rahul Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- S.P.S. Chauhan,Smt. Meenakshi Chauhan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 S Rawat
Digitally signed by :- SHOBHIT RAWAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings arising from a compromised matrimonial dispute should be quashed in the interest of justice.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi NarayanRelied on¶13
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others , AIR 2019 SC 1296 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rahul Kumar And 2 Others
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
