Dismissed

Vikas Alias Vijay and Another v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC13 Aug 2024A482/15017/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application by Vikas @ Vijay and Manish Kumar to quash proceedings and stay charges, the court held that the prayers were not pressed. It directed that bail applications filed within two weeks would be considered.

What did the court decide?

Prayers to quash proceedings and stay charged dismissed as not pressed. Leave to file bail application within two weeks.

Vikas Alias Vijay and Another vs State of Up and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:131238

¶2

Court No. - 77

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15017 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikas Alias Vijay And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ved Ratan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Ved Ratan, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A-1 for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants-Vikas @ Vijay and Manish Kumar with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 934 of 2021 (State Vs. Vijay @ Vikash and others) and charge sheet dated 31.12.2020 as well as cognizance order dated 30.10.2021 arising out of case crime no.433 of 2020, u/s 452, 353, 506 IPC, P.S. Jawan, District Aligarh pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Aligarh with a further prayer that proceedings of the aforesaid case be stayed against the applicants during the pendency of the present application.

¶7

After arguments on merits at length learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition. He states that the purpose of the applicants would be served if they are permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application.

¶8

Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, the prayer as prayed for is dismissed as not pressed.

¶10

However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that if the accused-applicants appear and apply for bail before the court concerned within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

¶11

The present application is disposed of.

¶12

(Samit Gopal, J.)

¶13

Order Date :- 13.8.2024 Gaurav Kuls

¶14

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vikas Alias Vijay and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Alias Vijay and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Sharma and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajay Kumar Shukla vs State of U.P. and Another

Vivek Gupta and 10 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahis vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinay Kumar Yadav vs State of Up and Another

Tarun Agrawal vs State of U.P. and Another