The applicants, charge-sheeted accused in a case under Sections 147, 323, and 325 IPC, challenged the police report and summoning order. The Court dismissed the application, noting that cross F.I.R.s were lodged and the occurrence was admitted, making the determination of the aggressor an issue for the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:158716
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14343 of 2024
Applicant :- Rinku And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Haya Rizvi,Zia Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
informant) and was registered as Case Crime No. 0286 of 2023 under Sections 147, 323 I.P.C., Police Station-Akrabad, DistrictAligarh. In the aforesaid F.I.R. eleven persons namely 1. Kaptan Singh 2. Reshmpal 3. Kandan Singh, 4. Sachin 5. Sunil 6.Vipin 7.Munesh 8. Premwati 9. Neetu, 10. Mamta 11. Pooja, have been nominated as named accused.
the record but further the same could not be dislodged by the learned counsel for applicants. In view of above, no good ground exists to entertain the present application.
Order Date :- 27.9.2024 YK
Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the police report and summoning order in view of cross F.I.R.s and admitted occurrence.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Rinku
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
