Disposed

Ajay Kumar Banoriya and 2 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC11 Nov 2024A482/12526/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a s. 482 application. Applicants withdrew the prayer for quashing and sought permission to file a discharge request. The Court directed the trial court to consider the discharge application expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; coercive action stayed for four weeks pending disposition of discharge application.

Ajay Kumar Banoriya and 2 Others vs State of Up… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:175943

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12526 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Banoriya And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harish Chandra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 09.11.2023, of Complaint Case No. 144 of 2022 (Suresh Chandra Verma Vs. Ajay Kumar Banoriya and others), under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.- Sipri Bazar, District- Jhansi, pending in the court of Additional District Judge 1st, Jhansi. The order dated 21.03.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court no.1, Jhansi in Criminal Revision No.278 of 2023, is also being impugned.

¶8

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that he is not pressing the prayer for quashing of proceedings and that applicants may be permitted to move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial Court concerned and till then protection may be granted to the applicants.

¶9

In view of aforesaid, it is directed that in case applicants move an application for discharge through counsel before the trial court concerned within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with

¶10

law by the court concerned. It is further directed that for a period of four weeks from today and in case such an application for discharge is filed within the aforesaid period, till the disposal of discharge application, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants, provided the applicants cooperate in early disposal of discharge application.

¶11

The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of with aforesaid observations.

¶12

Order Date :- 11.11.2024 SP/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajay Kumar Banoriya and 2 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Banoriya and 2 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tej Pal Singh and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Abhishek Kumar and 3 Others vs State of Up and Another

Smt Namita Alias Neetu Chhabra vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Gayatri and Another vs State of Up and Another

Dhirendra Kumar Maurya vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramdas Yadav and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another