Dismissed

Lakshmi Kant Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC29 Jul 2024A482/11534/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 CrPC quashing a charge sheet and staying proceedings since the applicant did not press the prayers. The court, however, directed the applicants to appear and seek bail before the trial court within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing applicants to file bail application before the trial court within two weeks.

Lakshmi Kant Yadav and 3 Others vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120988

¶2

Court No. - 77

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11534 of 2024 Applicant :- Lakshmi Kant Yadav And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants- Lakshmi Kant Yadav, Ramesh Chandra, Suresh Chandra and Juvenile "X" with the prayer to quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 12.9.2023 as well as order dated 18.11.2023 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 15 Azamgarh arising out of case crime no. 191 of 2023, Criminal Case No. 279 of 2024 (State Vs. Lakshmi Kant Yadav and others) u/s 323, 447, 506 IPC, P.S. Didarganj, District Azamgarh with a further prayer that further proceedings of the aforesaid case be stayed against the applicants during the pendency of the present application.

¶7

After arguments on merits at length learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the prayers made in the present petition. He states that the purpose of the applicants would be served if they are permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application.

¶8

Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, the prayer as prayed for is dismissed as not pressed.

¶10

However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that if the accused-applicants appear and apply for bail before the court concerned within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

¶11

The present application is disposed of.

¶12

(Samit Gopal, J.)

¶13

Order Date :- 29.7.2024/Gaurav Kuls

¶14

Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Lakshmi Kant Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmi Kant Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Surya Prakash Verma and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Fakharuddin and Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinay Kumar Alias Vijay and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Riyaj Alias Riyaj vs State of U.P. and Another

Varun Tyagi vs State of Up and Another