The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash summons and criminal proceedings under the U.P. Excise Act. The court held the application was misconceived because the charge was already framed in 2019, which the applicant failed to challenge in a previous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:84766
Court No. - 13
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11391 of 2024
Applicant :- Arun Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Zubair Hasan,Shakeel Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard.
Order Date :- 17.12.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable when the charge has already been framed.
Whether a failure to disclose framing of charges in a prior application warrants dismissal of the current application.
7 provisions across 2 enactments
Arun Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
